![]() Congress, he said, had, in effect, bound NASA’s hands by requiring the agency to engage in “cost-plus” contracts with suppliers. There certainly was at the House committee hearing where NASA Inspector General Paul Martin pointed his straight at the representatives on the committee. Whenever an extensive, public federal program like this runs into trouble, there is bound to be finger-pointing. Credit – House Science, Space, and Technology Committee YouTube Channe YouTube recording of the House Subcommittee meeting where the Inspector General reported their findings. NASA administrators even preemptively cautioned that the updated date might be hard to hit. In fact, an additional delay right before the Congressional hearings pushed a critical test milestone back another two months to May. Budgeted initially with $7 billion, the project cost has ballooned to over $23 billion, with no end in sight. Lacking a system to put its own astronauts into orbit, NASA reached out to its commercial partners to help facilitate its design and construction. SLS’s development started in 2011 after NASA retired the Space Shuttle. Therefore, it would have the unique ability to launch single payloads that had never been possible before. Granted, SLS would potentially be the biggest launch system ever created when (or if) it leaves the ground. It is also an absurd amount of money, coming in at a whopping $58,000 per kilogram launched to low Earth orbit if the expected payload weights are to be believed. That’s over double the original expected launch cost. ![]() Like, really expensive - to the tune of $4.1 billion per launch, according to the NASA Inspector General. August 17, 2022.This will likely come as a surprise to no one who has closely watched the development of NASA’s next giant rocket, the Space Launch System ( SLS), but it’s going to be expensive to use. NASA's next-generation moon rocket, the Space Launch System (SLS) Artemis 1 rocket with its Orion crew capsule stands on launch pad 39B as workers depart at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, U.S. The dress rehearsal was repeated at the pad in June, with improved results. ![]() A countdown test in April was marred by fuel leaks and other equipment trouble, forcing NASA to return the rocket to the hangar for repairs. This was the rocket’s third trip to the pad. “I want to underscore that this is a test flight,” Nelson said. The space agency wants a more diverse team and more sustained effort under Artemis, named after Apollo’s mythological twin sister. Twenty-four astronauts flew to the moon during Apollo, with 12 of them landing on it from 1969 through 1972. “But it’s a totally different, new, highly sophisticated, more sophisticated rocket and spacecraft.” It looks like we’re looking back toward the Saturn V,” NASA Administrator Bill Nelson told reporters earlier this month. “When you look at the rocket, it almost looks retro. But it’s more powerful, using a core stage and twin strap-on boosters, similar to the ones used for the space shuttles. NASA’s new SLS moon rocket, short for Space Launch System, is 41 feet (12 meters) shorter than the Saturn V rockets used during Apollo a half-century ago. “Now for the first time since 1972, we’re going to be launching a rocket that’s designed for deep space,” NASA’s rocket program manager, John Honeycutt, said recently. The years of delays have added billions of dollars to the cost. ![]() That’s much later than NASA anticipated when it established the program more than a decade ago, as the space shuttle fleet retired. The space agency is aiming for a lunar-orbiting flight with astronauts in two years and a lunar landing by a human crew as early as 2025. The flight is the first moonshot in NASA’s Artemis program. READ MORE: NASA’s Webb Space Telescope offers a window into the cosmos The capsule will fly around the moon in a distant orbit for a couple weeks, before heading back for a splashdown in the Pacific. No one will be inside the crew capsule atop the rocket, just three mannequins swarming with sensors to measure radiation and vibration. It took nearly 10 hours for the rocket to make the four-mile trip to the pad, pulling up at sunrise. The 322-foot (98-meter) rocket emerged from its mammoth hangar late Tuesday night, drawing crowds of Kennedy Space Center workers, many of whom were not yet born when NASA sent astronauts to the moon a half-century ago. (AP) - NASA’s new moon rocket arrived at the launch pad Wednesday ahead of its debut flight in less than two weeks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |